| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Several tags around PostgreSQL 7.1 broken |
| Date: | 2008-04-02 20:53:01 |
| Message-ID: | 8C18830A0F3A6429ECDB60A8@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, April 02, 2008 10:10:59 +0200 Magnus Hagander
<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Could it be that a commit was done while the tag operation was running?
> Given that neither is an atomic operation in cvs, and it used to be
> that large repo operations could take quite a long time?
I doubt it, back in 7.1 days, we had something like 4 committers, I think, and
all core members ... very little chance of overlap ... the weird thing is Peter
is reporting its *all* on the 7.1 branch ... none of hte others affected ...
- --
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFH8/It4QvfyHIvDvMRAqnKAJ4h/+4elPLe3XEfW9lRU6IfAAiSWgCcCRCd
pWs76n1JzLgiOExj6kGytBA=
=XVkS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-02 20:53:09 | Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-02 20:48:19 | Re: bug in float8in() |