Re: FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration

Just a thought. Why not separate postgres and postgres jdbc in that
case?

Jayesh

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [SMTP:pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us]
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:56 PM
> To: Barry Lind
> Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [JDBC] FW: Re: [PATCHES] Ant configuration
>
> > If we can include the ANT libraries in our CVS then my
> > objection to ANT (requiring users to trackdown and download ANT)
> goes
> > away, and I would then suggest we continue to use ANT for the other
> > reasons you mention.
> >
> > Does anyone know if we could include ANT into our CVS and
> redistribute
> > it in order to build the jdbc code? Are their license
> incompatibilities
> > between the Apache License and the PostgreSQL license that would
> prevent
> > this?
>
> I don't think we want to go there. Too much bloat to add it. Looks
> like 600k.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
> 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly