Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> writes:
> 2012/7/3 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>> Um... what should happen if there was a SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION
>> to the portal's userId? This test will think nothing happened.
> In my test, all the jobs by SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION was cleaned-up...
> It makes nothing happen from viewpoint of users.
My point is that it seems like a bug that the secContext gets restored
in one case and not the other, depending on which user ID was specified
in SET SESSION AUTHORIZATION.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-07-03 16:09:59|
|Subject: Re: Event Triggers reduced, v1|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-07-03 16:02:21|
|Subject: Re: Posix Shared Mem patch|