| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Andy Anderson" <aanderson(at)amherst(dot)edu>, "Postgres General List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bottom Posting |
| Date: | 2008-05-28 18:30:06 |
| Message-ID: | 87y75up9ht.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Bottom line: have some respect for your readers. Make it easy to
> distinguish what you wrote from the preceding material, and remember
> that the only reason you are quoting anything at all is to provide some
> context for what you are saying. We don't need to re-read the entire
> darn thread.
I don't think the people who top-post or quote the entire message are doing it
out of disrespect. They just have never been exposed to the traditional style.
The main reason I posted this was to demonstrate that there's really no reason
to quote the original message. My response was only to this one point and not
the longer previous point. I actually think this is a more important point to
get across than simply "don't top post" which just seems to generate lots of
"bottom posts" that are just as bad.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's RemoteDBA services!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-05-28 18:32:41 | Re: Open Source CRM - Options? |
| Previous Message | Francisco Reyes | 2008-05-28 17:04:02 | Re: Psql crashes with Segmentation fault on copy from |