Re: Solaris Performance (Again)

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Solaris Performance (Again)
Date: 2003-12-10 19:15:35
Message-ID: 87smjs4h7s.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> Note : The Pgbench runs were conducted using -s 10 and -t 1000 -c
> 1->64, 2 - 3 runs of each setup were performed (averaged figures
> shown).

FYI, the pgbench docs state:

NOTE: scaling factor should be at least as large as the largest
number of clients you intend to test; else you'll mostly be
measuring update contention.

-Neil

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-12-10 19:32:03 Re: Strange permission problem regarding pg_settings
Previous Message Andrew Rawnsley 2003-12-10 19:01:53 Re: pljava revisited

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message nbarraza 2003-12-10 19:29:58
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-12-10 17:18:02 Re: TRUNCATE veeeery slow compared to DELETE in 7.4