Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Solaris Performance (Again)

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Solaris Performance (Again)
Date: 2003-12-10 19:15:35
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> writes:
> Note : The Pgbench runs were conducted using -s 10 and -t 1000 -c
> 1->64, 2 - 3 runs of each setup were performed (averaged figures
> shown).

FYI, the pgbench docs state:

      NOTE: scaling factor should be at least as large as the largest
      number of clients you intend to test; else you'll mostly be
      measuring update contention.


In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: nbarrazaDate: 2003-12-10 19:29:58
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2003-12-10 17:18:02
Subject: Re: TRUNCATE veeeery slow compared to DELETE in 7.4

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-12-10 19:32:03
Subject: Re: Strange permission problem regarding pg_settings
Previous:From: Andrew RawnsleyDate: 2003-12-10 19:01:53
Subject: Re: pljava revisited

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group