Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Jav Database Performance

From: Florian Weimer <fw(at)deneb(dot)enyo(dot)de>
To: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
Cc: Walter Cruz <walter(dot)php(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Jav Database Performance
Date: 2007-02-26 19:59:56
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
* Markus Schiltknecht:

> I can only conclude, that PostgreSQL does a very well job in keeping
> the costs of consistency very low. ;-)

And the cost of indexes.  Which makes me doubt whether there is a
systematic error in the benchmark.  Perhaps this is a result of the
small working set.

In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Markus SchiltknechtDate: 2007-02-26 20:03:19
Subject: Re: Jav Database Performance
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2007-02-26 19:06:31
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL on Windows Paper

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group