Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> writes:
> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 18:13:23 +0000,
> Jaime Casanova <el_vigia_ec(at)hotmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hi all, is there a way to set the isolation level to something like the
> > sql standard dirty read.
> No. There will be a way to use the standard name in a SET command, but
> you will actaully get READ COMMITTED isolation (which is the next step up).
I wonder how hard this would be to implement. It doesn't seem like it should
be very hard.
It would be very convenient for debugging and for checking on the progress of
large batch updates or loads.
In response to
pgsql-sql by date
|Next:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2004-05-14 05:40:26|
|Subject: Re: Multiple outer join on same table|
|Previous:||From: Stephan Szabo||Date: 2004-05-14 05:24:06|
|Subject: Re: a wierd query|