Re: Prepared statement performance...

From: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
To: Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Prepared statement performance...
Date: 2002-09-26 03:40:17
Message-ID: 87ofalwh9a.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-jdbc

Dmitry Tkach <dmitry(at)openratings(dot)com> writes:
> Any chance to get a patch that could be applied over a 7.2 source?

I'm not planning to -- but since the PREPARE/EXECUTE stuff is almost
entirely separated from the rest of the system, it would probably be
pretty easy to do.

> >Note that in 7.3, functions can return sets of tuples.

> Yeah... I know that... But, same comment as above applies - the
> migration is what scares the hell out of me :-(

FYI, backpatching this to 7.2 would not be feasible.

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-26 03:55:56 Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-09-26 03:28:19 Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vernon Wu 2002-09-26 06:48:14 Is the JDBC driver i18n compatible?
Previous Message Dan Robinson 2002-09-25 22:05:46 Problems with the size of a select parameter?