swampler(at)noao(dot)edu (Steve Wampler) writes:
> Or does losing WAL files mandate a new initdb?
Losing WAL would mandate initdb, so I'd think this all fits into the
set of stuff worth putting onto ramfs/tmpfs. Certainly it'll all be
significant to the performance focus.
select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'cbbrowne.com';
"MS apparently now has a team dedicated to tracking problems with
Linux and publicizing them. I guess eventually they'll figure out
this back fires... ;)" -- William Burrow <aa126(at)DELETE(dot)fan(dot)nb(dot)ca>
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-06-15 18:44:32|
|Subject: Re: [PERFORM] No hash join across partitioned tables?|
|Previous:||From: Craig James||Date: 2010-06-15 17:12:38|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL as a local in-memory cache|