| From: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET? |
| Date: | 2007-12-14 01:47:23 |
| Message-ID: | 87lk7ym4ic.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I'm fairly surprised these queries work. Is there some reason why we
> support this? April Fools Day? Jules Verne? I'm all for fast queries,
> but zero seems like the lowest value we should support...
Huh, I was all set to post an example of a useful application of it but then
apparently I'm wrong and it doesn't work:
postgres=# select * from generate_series(1,10) offset -1 limit 2;
generate_series
-----------------
1
2
(2 rows)
I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to guess what I was expecting.
So given that that doesn't work I don't see any particular reason to accept
negative offsets or limits in 8.4 and on.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-12-14 02:43:28 | Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET? |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-12-14 01:19:01 | Negative LIMIT and OFFSET? |