Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Standalone synchronous master

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Alexander Björnhagen <alex(dot)bjornhagen(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master
Date: 2011-12-26 15:05:31
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> If you don't care about the absolute guarantee of data, why not just
> use async replication? It's still going to replicate the data over to
> the client as quickly as it can - which in the end is the same level
> of guarantee that you get with this switch set, isn't it?

Isn't that equivalent to setting synchronous_standby_names to '' and
reloading the server?

Dimitri Fontaine     PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2011-12-26 15:23:32
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master
Previous:From: Alexander BjörnhagenDate: 2011-12-26 14:59:32
Subject: Re: Standalone synchronous master

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group