Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Date: 2004-02-27 05:17:06
Message-ID: 87ishtgkz1.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> I would favor using Bugzilla over anything else just because I'm used
> to it (have to use it internally at Red Hat anyway).

I might suggest again RT. It's open source and has serious commercial
traction. The postgres port needs a lot of work for it to really catch up to
the original MySQL implementation so most of the users are using it with
MySQL.

But it works ok under postgres and having more postgres-familiar eyes looking
at it would help polish both its postgres port and fix the problems it exposes
in the postgres optimizer.

It's more of a generic ticketing system than a single-purpose bug tracking
system though. I'm not sure how smoothly it would be usable for bug-tracking
an open source project like postgres.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-27 05:25:31 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Cott Lang 2004-02-27 04:01:41 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-27 05:25:31 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Cott Lang 2004-02-27 04:01:41 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-27 05:25:31 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Cott Lang 2004-02-27 04:01:41 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-02-27 05:25:31 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal
Previous Message Cott Lang 2004-02-27 04:01:41 Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal