Re: GiST index build versus NaN coordinates

From: Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: GiST index build versus NaN coordinates
Date: 2016-07-16 14:13:05
Message-ID: 87d1md1xji.fsf@credativ.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:

> Sounds like some fuzz testing with nan/infinity is in order.

related fallout: close_ps returns a NULL pointer with NaNs around:

select close_ps('(nan,nan)', '(nan,nan),(nan,nan)');
-- TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(result != ((void *)0))", File: "geo_ops.c", Line: 2860)

regards,
Andreas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2016-07-16 14:48:01 Re: Regression tests vs existing users in an installation
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2016-07-16 12:20:58 Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails