Re: parallel safety of correlated subquery

From: Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com>
To: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: parallel safety of correlated subquery
Date: 2025-07-04 00:26:55
Message-ID: 87bjq04x80.fsf@163.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com> writes:

Hi,

> Andy Fan <zhihuifan1213(at)163(dot)com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> After some coding with this subject, I think it is better redefining
> the problem and solution.
..
> Hope I have made myself clear, any feedback is welcome!

While I was registering this patch to commitfest, I found thread [1]
which wanted to improve the exact same question, but the solution is
different[2]. So anyone who is interested with this topic, probably want
to have a check on [1] as well.

[1]
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAAaqYe_x1u3V4uPiv%3DdJ%3Dk2EJ7txhdq6yexJDkYZ1x1pu0QwcQ%40mail.gmail.com

[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/87frfd9xqx.fsf%40163.com

commitfest for this thread: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5892/

--
Best Regards
Andy Fan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2025-07-04 01:41:35 Re: Pathify RHS unique-ification for semijoin planning
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2025-07-04 00:10:31 Re: Speedup truncations of temporary relation forks