Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Partitioning / Clustering

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: Alex Stapleton <alexs(at)advfn(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Partitioning / Clustering
Date: 2005-05-11 20:02:01
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Alex Stapleton <alexs(at)advfn(dot)com> writes:

> Acceptable Answers to 'So, when/is PG meant to be getting a decent
> partitioning system?':
>      3. Your welcome to take a stab at it, I expect the community  would
> support your efforts as well.

As long as we're being curt all around, this one's not acceptable on the basis
that it's not grammatical.


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-05-11 20:22:13
Subject: Re: Partitioning / Clustering
Previous:From: Guillaume SmetDate: 2005-05-11 19:57:02
Subject: Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group