Alex Stapleton <alexs(at)advfn(dot)com> writes:
> Acceptable Answers to 'So, when/is PG meant to be getting a decent
> partitioning system?':
> 3. Your welcome to take a stab at it, I expect the community would
> support your efforts as well.
As long as we're being curt all around, this one's not acceptable on the basis
that it's not grammatical.
In response to
pgsql-performance by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2005-05-11 20:22:13|
|Subject: Re: Partitioning / Clustering|
|Previous:||From: Guillaume Smet||Date: 2005-05-11 19:57:02|
|Subject: Re: Bad plan after vacuum analyze|