Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option

From: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option
Date: 2020-04-08 04:29:24
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "Alvaro" == Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:

>> This needs to be fixed in ruleutils, IMO, not by changing what the
>> grammar accepts.

Alvaro> Fair. I didn't change what the grammar accepts. I ended up only
Alvaro> throwing an error in parse analysis when a bare NULL const is
Alvaro> seen.

This seems far too arbitrary to me.

Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2020-04-08 04:58:49 Re: A problem about partitionwise join
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2020-04-08 04:16:18 Re: proposal \gcsv