Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown

From: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
To: PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com>
Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown
Date: 2005-02-16 04:19:25
Message-ID: 873bvx2l2q.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


PFC <lists(at)boutiquenumerique(dot)com> writes:

> You can also read 'internal not yet developed postgres cache manager'
> instead of OS if you don't feel like talking kernel developers into
> implementing this thing.

It exists already, it's called aio.

But there are a *lot* of details you skipped over.
And as always, the devil is in the details.

--
greg

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Brown 2005-02-16 21:09:28 Re: How to interpret this explain analyse?
Previous Message PFC 2005-02-15 21:55:32 Re: seq scan cache vs. index cache smackdown