Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4

From: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Hannes Dorbath" <light(at)theendofthetunnel(dot)de>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Index trouble with 8.3b4
Date: 2008-01-07 15:18:46
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
"Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> I didn't have any luck reproducing either of these behaviors --- maybe
> it's data-dependent.  Can you extract a test case?

I haven't been able to reproduce this either but I produced an entirely
different problem:

postgres=# create index concurrently dg5 on doc using gin (to_tsvector('english',d));
ERROR:  deadlock detected
DETAIL:  Process 7076 waits for ShareLock on unrecognized locktag type 5; blocked by process 10497.
Process 10497 waits for ShareUpdateExclusiveLock on relation 24656 of database 11511; blocked by process 7076.

  Gregory Stark
  Ask me about EnterpriseDB's Slony Replication support!

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2008-01-07 15:41:46
Subject: Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2008-01-07 15:01:50
Subject: Re: OUTER JOIN performance regression remains in8.3beta4

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: mljvDate: 2008-01-07 15:31:40
Subject: File system level backup from 32bit to 64bit
Previous:From: Dennis BrakhaneDate: 2008-01-07 15:01:21
Subject: Can a stored procedure that creates a temp table be declared STABLE?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group