Re: Additional logging for VACUUM and ANALYZE

From: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Additional logging for VACUUM and ANALYZE
Date: 2017-10-09 14:52:27
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/5/17, 12:29 AM, "Michael Paquier" <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> and a test that exercises a bit of this functionality.
> My take on those test would be to not include them. This is a lot just
> to test two logging lines where the relation has been dropped.

Here is a new version of the patch without the tests.


Attachment Content-Type Size
new_vacuum_log_messages_v2.patch application/octet-stream 5.9 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2017-10-09 15:15:14 Re: Pluggable storage
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-10-09 14:32:19 Re: Pluggable storage