Re: pg_dump performance

"Jared Mauch" <jared(at)puck(dot)nether(dot)net> writes:

> pg_dump is utilizing about 13% of the cpu and the
> corresponding postgres backend is at 100% cpu time.
> (multi-core, multi-cpu, lotsa ram, super-fast disk).
>...
> pg8.3(beta) with the following variances from default
>
> checkpoint_segments = 300 # in logfile segments, min 1, 16MB each
> effective_cache_size = 512MB # typically 8KB each
> wal_buffers = 128MB # min 4, 8KB each
> shared_buffers = 128MB # min 16, at least max_connections*2, 8KB each
> work_mem = 512MB # min 64, size in KB

Fwiw those are pretty unusual numbers. Normally work_mem is much smaller than
shared_buffers since you only need one block of memory for shared buffers and
work_mem is for every query (and every sort within those queries). If you have
ten queries running two sorts each this setting of work_mem could consume 5GB.

Raising shared buffers could improve your pg_dump speed. If all the data is in
cache it would reduce the time spend moving data between filesystem cache and
postgres shared buffers.

What made you raise wal_buffers so high? I don't think it hurts but that's a
few orders of magnitude higher than what I would expect to help.

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support!