Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgFoundry Download URLs

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgFoundry Download URLs
Date: 2010-01-04 20:22:25
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-www
On Jan 4, 2010, at 12:06 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:

> and makes it harder to aggregate them back into a canonical search/aggregator which is what some people want...

How so? It's not hard to aggregate stuff, and we're not doing it *at all* right now.

> I hope you are not advocating we should put those lists on again which is almost the opposite of what you proposed with "hosting stuff elsewhere. Also a fair number of the above mentioned  resources don't actually provide mailinglists.

Any subdomain would do.

>> 2) a place for web pages/documentation for some projects (which could be
>> a wiki, or something else)
> hmm? again this sounds like a central wiki (which we have) or are you asking for every project running their own wiki?

The latter. Which most other project hosting sites already offer.

> again the news feed stuff is mostly a tool issue (newer fusionforge versions do actually have way better RSS feed capabilities). However what we probably want is a thin aggregation layer on top of those (maybe a version of on steriods with aggregates the various feeds and adds search on top).


> imho that one is not at all related to pgfoundry or the problem at hand.

Well, it's certainly related to download URLs. But it's not at all what pgFoundry does, I agree.

> so what place would you redirect people too if they ask for a listing of stuff related to postgresql? and no I don't think a manually maintained "software catalogue" like we have on the website is any/much better.




In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Stefan KaltenbrunnerDate: 2010-01-04 20:30:20
Subject: Re: pgFoundry Download URLs
Previous:From: Stefan KaltenbrunnerDate: 2010-01-04 20:06:53
Subject: Re: pgFoundry Download URLs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group