On Dec 31, 2009, at 1:04 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think the primary use will be to load a JSON value into Perl or Python
> and process it there. So a json type that doesn't have any interesting
> operators doesn't sound useless to me. The features I would like to get
> out of it are input validation and encoding handling and smooth
> integration with said languages.
What about access to various parts of a JSON data structure? Or is that just asking for too much trouble up-front?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2009-12-31 16:03:37|
|Subject: uintptr_t for Datum|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2009-12-31 15:58:45|
|Subject: Re: Cancelling idle in transaction state|