Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] pgxs/windows

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgxs/windows
Date: 2006-01-19 20:33:25
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> The difference between Magnus's and Andrew's is
> that Magnus used MODULE_big (which means create a shared library), while
> Andrew used MODULES.  So, Magnus's only worked because he was creating a
> DLL and that brought in the -L from MODULE_big.

Ah, good catch.

> I have applied the following patch to change /bin to /lib for Cygwin and
> Win32.

What about the question of whether $(DESTDIR) belongs there or not?
I think we had concluded that PGXS shouldn't ever use $(DESTDIR),
because that's only for install-time stuff.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-01-19 20:34:56
Subject: Re: Indexes vs. cache flushes
Previous:From: Jim C. NasbyDate: 2006-01-19 20:30:41
Subject: Re: Indexes vs. cache flushes

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-01-19 20:45:45
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgxs/windows
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-01-19 20:15:06
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgxs/windows

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group