Re: Infinities in type numeric

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Infinities in type numeric
Date: 2020-07-22 23:20:35
Message-ID: 86203.1595460035@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 at 23:18, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Here's a v4 that syncs numeric in_range() with the new behavior of
>> float in_range(), and addresses your other comments too.

> LGTM.

Pushed. Thanks again for reviewing!

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-07-23 00:11:09 Re: Why it is not possible to create custom AM which behaves similar to btree?
Previous Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2020-07-22 23:15:56 Why it is not possible to create custom AM which behaves similar to btree?