| From: | David Costa <geeks(at)dotgeek(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Question |
| Date: | 2004-02-21 01:59:02 |
| Message-ID: | 856CBCFD-6411-11D8-BEFA-000A95EB456A@dotgeek.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Feb 21, 2004, at 2:14 AM, Robert Treat wrote:
> Hey David,
>
> we do have an quasi-official advocacy group that consists of Josh
> Berkus,
> Bruce Momjian, and myself. However there are certainly a large number
> of
> folks outside of that group who do advocacy work so don't let that
> stop you.
> I wouldn't see any issues using a sig like "PostgreSQL Advocate",
> would that
> work?
>
Yes that's a very good idea. Thanks for your hint.
so another beta
>> Regards,
>> David Costa, PostgreSQL Advocate
>> link to postgresql site http://postgresql.org
>> $myemail
For the last line , anyone has some ideas for a one line postgresql
query to represent our logic power ? :D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Costa | 2004-02-21 02:01:16 | Re: Question |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-02-21 01:53:54 | Re: Question |