RE: version numbers of WinODBC

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: "'Kovacs Zoltan Sandor'" <tip(at)pc10(dot)radnoti-szeged(dot)sulinet(dot)hu>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "'Joel Burton'" <jburton(at)scw(dot)org>, Pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: version numbers of WinODBC
Date: 2000-12-19 13:21:03
Message-ID: 8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A280E@woody.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kovacs Zoltan Sandor [mailto:tip(at)pc10(dot)radnoti-szeged(dot)sulinet(dot)hu]
> Sent: 19 December 2000 12:53
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: 'Joel Burton'; Pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: version numbers of WinODBC
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > Just downloaded this driver to get the referential
> integrity stuff and find
> > that the version number is 6.40.0.9 whereas the latest
> version that Byron (I
> > assume it was Byron anyway) compiled was 6.50.0.0. Is your
> version based on
> > older code or is there another reason for this?
> There were so many misunderstandings and confusions about the version
> numbers. I suggest rewriting the version number (in psqlodbc.h and
> psqlodbc.rc) after each submitted patch for each submitter.
> As I can see
> in the CVS, last 6 months the source was modified by Peter,
> Thomas, Tom
> and Bruce. My idea is to change the version number to 7.0.3.1
> or 7.1.0.0
> if you experience that the driver works with 7.1devel.
>

Sounds sensible. I suspect that the non-Windows programmers might need
reminding to update psqlodbc.rc though.

Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Clark, Joel 2000-12-19 13:44:18 RE: Connection Pooling...(Repost)...please do help..
Previous Message Kovacs Zoltan Sandor 2000-12-19 12:53:04 version numbers of WinODBC