Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up
Date: 2009-05-28 14:52:49
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> That would suck for me.  I use git log a lot to see how things have
>> changed over time.

> Indeed. Losing the history is not an acceptable option.

I think the same.  If git is not able to maintain our project history
then it is not mature enough to be considered as our official VCS.
This is not a negotiable requirement.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-05-28 14:53:10
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up
Previous:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2009-05-28 14:47:47
Subject: Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group