Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Slow tab completion (7.4)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rod Taylor <rbt(at)sitesell(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slow tab completion (7.4)
Date: 2004-12-24 15:44:34
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Rod Taylor <rbt(at)sitesell(dot)com> writes:
> It seems that with more than a few thousand structures in pg_class, tab
> completion seems to take quite a long time in the en_US locale.

> Simply switching the where clauses around gets a substantial performance
> increase.

Hm.  There's no guarantee that the planner will evaluate the WHERE
clauses in the same order you write them, but it does seem to work that
way for these particular queries at the moment, so we may as well write
the clauses in the best order.  You're right that the foo_is_visible()
family of functions are pretty slow...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2004-12-24 15:46:27
Subject: Re: RC2 and open issues
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2004-12-23 21:58:37
Subject: Re: CreateFunctionStmt struct

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group