Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: use of OID.Unknown

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: use of OID.Unknown
Date: 2005-11-08 20:32:57
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
[ resending from proper address ]

Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It'd be a good idea to go back and look at the details before thinking
>> of adopting UNKNOWN in a more general context.

> No, actually we went with this solution simply because we had no other 
> options.  This may work fine for text data, but how could we possibly 
> implement sending in binary format?

That one's simple --- you don't.  Anything you have down as UNKNOWN,
send as text.  You have the option per-parameter in Bind, remember.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Dave CramerDate: 2005-11-08 22:57:20
Subject: Re: use of OID.Unknown
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2005-11-08 19:12:45
Subject: Re: use of OID.Unknown

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group