| From: | Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DISTINCT -> GROUP BY |
| Date: | 2008-06-04 12:36:41 |
| Message-ID: | 8404931B-038E-4F98-98C9-BCEC81B476DF@decibel.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Jun 3, 2008, at 9:03 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 03:36:44PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>> Hello David
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs.TODO.html
>>
>> Consider using hash buckets to do DISTINCT, rather than sorting This
>> would be beneficial when there are few distinct values. This is
>> already used by GROUP BY.
>
> It's nice to see that this is kinda on the TODO, but it doesn't
> address the question I asked, which is, "how would I get the planner
> to rewrite DISTINCTs as the equivalent GROUP BYs?" :)
IIRC, the patch to allow GROUP BY to do hashing is fairly recent...
you could probably find it in archives.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Decibel! | 2008-06-04 12:44:53 | Re: Proposal: new function array_init |
| Previous Message | Decibel! | 2008-06-04 12:35:04 | Re: intercepting WAL writes |