From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: WAL logging freezing |
Date: | 2006-10-24 14:11:43 |
Message-ID: | 8348.1161699103@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I would've liked to give freezing a new opcode,
> but we've ran out of them (see htup.h).
Hardly ... we have plenty of unused rmgr id's still.
The real issue that still has to be resolved is the interaction of all
this stuff with PITR scenarios --- is it still safe to not log hint-bit
updates when PITR is on? I think it's premature to start writing
patches until we've decided how this really needs to work.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | mark | 2006-10-24 14:18:16 | Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8 |
Previous Message | Markus Schiltknecht | 2006-10-24 13:54:22 | Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-10-24 15:18:02 | Further MSVC build updates |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-24 13:39:34 | Re: [HACKERS] COPY does not work with regproc and aclitem |