Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WAL logging freezing

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL logging freezing
Date: 2006-10-24 14:11:43
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> I would've liked to give freezing a new opcode, 
>   but we've ran out of them (see htup.h).

Hardly ... we have plenty of unused rmgr id's still.

The real issue that still has to be resolved is the interaction of all
this stuff with PITR scenarios --- is it still safe to not log hint-bit
updates when PITR is on?  I think it's premature to start writing
patches until we've decided how this really needs to work.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: markDate: 2006-10-24 14:18:16
Subject: Re: New CRC algorithm: Slicing by 8
Previous:From: Markus SchiltknechtDate: 2006-10-24 13:54:22
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication documentation addition

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2006-10-24 15:18:02
Subject: Further MSVC build updates
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-10-24 13:39:34
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] COPY does not work with regproc and aclitem

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group