Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?

From: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY?
Date: 2024-07-09 16:03:29
Message-ID: 83298.1720541009@antos
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > > Is your plan to work on it soon or should I try to write a draft patch? (I
> > > assume this is for PG >= 18.)
> >
> > I don't have plans for it, so if you have resources, please go for it.
>
> The first version is attached. The actual feature is in 0003. 0004 is probably
> not necessary now, but I haven't realized until I coded it.

The mailing list archive indicates something is wrong with the 0003
attachment. Sending it all again, as *.tar.

--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
vacuum_full_concurrently_v01.tar application/x-tar 245.0 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Erik Wienhold 2024-07-09 16:20:46 Re: XML test error on Arch Linux
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-07-09 15:59:05 Re: array_in sub function ReadArrayDimensions error message