| From: | "Tomas Vondra" <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Tomas Vondra" <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress |
| Date: | 2011-09-02 13:25:09 |
| Message-ID: | 801b970ec2b13e81fbd073dfc4252464.squirrel@sq.gransy.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2 Září 2011, 12:45, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:01, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> wrote:
>> What about logging it with a lower level, e.g. NOTICE instead of the
>> current LOG? If that's not a solution then a new GUC is needed I guess.
>
> I guess if it's at a DEBUG level it won't annoy anybody who doesn't
> need it. Not sure if NOTICE is low enough..
I've changed the level to NOTICE. I guess I could put that to info, but
the debug levels seem too low to me. Is there a rule of a thumb about
where to put messages?
Tomas
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| checkpoint-stats-update-v3.diff | text/plain | 3.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2011-09-02 13:44:42 | Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress |
| Previous Message | PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig | 2011-09-02 13:17:10 | Re: help with plug-in function for additional (partition/shard) visibility checks |