Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress

From: "Tomas Vondra" <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Tomas Vondra" <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress
Date: 2011-09-02 13:25:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2 Září 2011, 12:45, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:01, Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> wrote:
>> What about logging it with a lower level, e.g. NOTICE instead of the
>> current LOG? If that's not a solution then a new GUC is needed I guess.
> I guess if it's at a DEBUG level it won't annoy anybody who doesn't
> need it. Not sure if NOTICE is low enough..

I've changed the level to NOTICE. I guess I could put that to info, but
the debug levels seem too low to me. Is there a rule of a thumb about
where to put messages?


Attachment: checkpoint-stats-update-v3.diff
Description: text/plain (3.4 KB)

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2011-09-02 13:44:42
Subject: Re: PATCH: regular logging of checkpoint progress
Previous:From: PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen SchönigDate: 2011-09-02 13:17:10
Subject: Re: help with plug-in function for additional (partition/shard) visibility checks

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group