Re: [HACKERS] Support for Secure Transport SSL library on macOS as OpenSSL alternative

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Support for Secure Transport SSL library on macOS as OpenSSL alternative
Date: 2018-10-05 12:19:44
Message-ID: 7f8442c9-8c17-4dca-8abc-79a633476529@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/10/2018 15:40, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 26/09/2018 23:19, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> It’s not clear to me just how common it is to use GCC via homebrew on macOS.
>
>> I use that all the time.
>
> Hm, so did 5e2217131 break anything for you? Does that version of gcc
> claim to know -F or -framework switches?

This is not a problem. The Python and Tcl build flags have included
-framework switches since time immemorial. (I suspect the compiler just
treats them as linker switches like -l and -L and passes them on.)

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesper Pedersen 2018-10-05 12:22:49 Re: partition tree inspection functions
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-10-05 12:15:30 Re: Procedure calls are not tracked in pg_stat_user_functions / track_functions