| From: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_catversion builtin function |
| Date: | 2016-12-14 13:56:00 |
| Message-ID: | 7f826199-1ade-04e9-86c1-d2c361358caf@redhat.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/14/2016 08:52 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> But I understand your concern, so "Rejected" is ok under
>>
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/12/906/
>
> I have a better reason for rejecting this patch: we already have this feature.
>
> rhaas=# select catalog_version_no from pg_control_system();
> catalog_version_no
> --------------------
> 201612081
> (1 row)
>
>
Ah, perfect !
Thanks, Robert
Best regards,
Jesper
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-12-14 14:05:39 | Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 0/1] PostgreSQL db: Retry on constraint violation [and 2 more messages] |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-14 13:52:18 | Re: pg_catversion builtin function |