Re: additional foreign key test coverage

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Mi Tar <mmitar(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: additional foreign key test coverage
Date: 2019-01-16 16:17:43
Message-ID: 7ee13607-7800-c2dc-a7f0-7ca92fb183c7@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/01/2019 09:20, Mi Tar wrote:
> I tested this patch and it applied cleanly and all tests passed. I haven't looked if the changes to tests are reasonable or extensive to cover all aspects of what they want to cover.

I have committed this with additional tests for partitioned tables, as
requested by Álvaro.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2019-01-16 16:20:37 Re: What to name the current heap after pluggable storage / what to rename?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-01-16 16:16:51 Re: O_DIRECT for relations and SLRUs (Prototype)