Re: port conflicts when running tests concurrently on windows.

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: port conflicts when running tests concurrently on windows.
Date: 2021-12-09 13:35:37
Message-ID: 7a217775-e9a5-f49a-c7f1-ba277b07e9e9@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09.12.21 03:44, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 11:46 AM Andres Freund<andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> Is it perhaps time to to use unix sockets on windows by default
>> (i.e. PG_TEST_USE_UNIX_SOCKETS), at least when on a new enough windows?

Makes sense to get this to work, at least as an option.

> Makes sense. As a data point, it looks like this feature is in all
> supported releases of Windows. It arrived in 1803, already EOL'd, and
> IIUC even a Windows Server 2016 "LTSC" system that's been disconnected
> from the internet and refusing all updates reaches "mainstream EOL"
> next month.

I believe the "18" in "1803" refers to 2018. We have Windows buildfarm
members that mention 2016 and 2017 in their title. Would those be in
trouble?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-12-09 13:35:41 Re: The "char" type versus non-ASCII characters
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-12-09 13:31:23 Re: Replace uses of deprecated Python module distutils.sysconfig