| From: | "Mikael Carneholm" <Mikael(dot)Carneholm(at)WirelessCar(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Autovacuum deadlock - bug or not? |
| Date: | 2005-11-17 15:20:44 |
| Message-ID: | 7F10D26ECFA1FB458B89C5B4B0D72C2B0A01E3@sesrv12.wirelesscar.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Forgot to mention:
dfol=> select version();
version
-------------------------------------------------------------
PostgreSQL 8.1.0 on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC 2.96
(1 row)
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: den 17 november 2005 16:04
To: Mikael Carneholm
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] Autovacuum deadlock - bug or not?
"Mikael Carneholm" <Mikael(dot)Carneholm(at)WirelessCar(dot)com> writes:
> variant: CLUSTER indexname ON tablename
Hmph. Looking at the code, that should always lock the table first,
so I don't see where the problem is. Would you look up the numbers
for us --- exactly which relations were involved in the deadlock,
and (if you can tell) which process was which?
Also, what PG version is this exactly?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Matt Carter | 2005-11-17 15:38:15 | Re: Huge query stalls at PARSE/BIND stage (2) |
| Previous Message | Mikael Carneholm | 2005-11-17 15:18:09 | Re: Autovacuum deadlock - bug or not? |