Re: Make better use of existing enums in plpgsql

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Make better use of existing enums in plpgsql
Date: 2016-09-09 14:23:59
Message-ID: 799f5101-a8fd-21a2-cfaf-b9dc45f13c97@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/4/16 12:26 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> I am sending review of this trivial patch.
>
> 1. No problems with patching, compiling
> 2. all regress tests passed
> 3. There are not any visible change, so tests, docs are not necessary
> 4. Using enum instead int is generally good idea
>
> I will mark this patch as ready for commiters.

Committed, thanks.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-09-09 14:39:11 Re: An extra error for client disconnection on Windows
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2016-09-09 14:15:43 Re: Add support for restrictive RLS policies