Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points
Date: 2012-07-03 15:34:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alexander Korotkov
> <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think we definitely should apply this patch before 9.2 release, because it
>> is a bug fix. Otherwise people will continue produce incorrect GiST indexes
>> with in-core geometrical opclasses until 9.3. Patch is very simple and only
>> changes few lines of code.
>> Any thoughts?

> Do we need to apply this patch to 9.2?

It's been like that all along, no?  I'm feeling hesitant to shove it
into 9.2 at this late date.  But we should review it and get it into
9.3 early if possible.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-07-03 15:35:57
Subject: Re: [Review] Prevent the specification of conflicting transaction read/write options
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2012-07-03 15:33:20
Subject: Re: [Review] Add SPI_gettypmod() to return a field's typemod from a TupleDesc

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group