Re: Non-decimal integer literals

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: John Naylor <john(dot)naylor(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Non-decimal integer literals
Date: 2022-11-22 13:36:45
Message-ID: 791aee01-f488-0706-2694-08c5b57a3bdd@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15.11.22 11:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 14.11.22 08:25, John Naylor wrote:
>> Regarding the patch, it looks good overall. My only suggestion would
>> be to add a regression test for just below and just above overflow, at
>> least for int2.
>
> ok

This was a valuable suggestion, because this found some breakage. In
particular, the handling of grammar-level literals that overflow to
"Float" was not correct. (The radix prefix was simply stripped and
forgotten.) So I added a bunch more tests for this. Here is a new patch.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v10-0001-Non-decimal-integer-literals.patch text/plain 39.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-11-22 13:45:17 Re: fixing CREATEROLE
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2022-11-22 13:10:01 Re: postgres_fdw binary protocol support