| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material |
| Date: | 2001-03-19 23:08:37 |
| Message-ID: | 7894.985043317@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> Is it really necessary to maintain identical text in the test README
>> file and in the SGML docs? I'm sorely tempted to remove the README
>> rather than double-editing yet again.
> It's referenced from the INSTALL file, because people presumably won't be
> able to read the HTML during installation. Actually, the README was once
> generated from the HTML version. It can be done again, but the exact
> process it kind of hazy.
If you've got any hints, I could really use a clue right about now ...
otherwise I'll have to do these LOCALE edits twice ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-03-19 23:13:36 | Re: [HACKERS] src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-19 22:37:33 | src/test/regress/README duplicates SGML material |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-03-19 23:10:43 | elog with automatic file, line, and function |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-03-19 22:56:32 | More on elog and error codes |