| From: | "Matthew Peters" <matthew(at)haydrian(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Stored procedure slower than sql? |
| Date: | 2006-10-26 16:21:37 |
| Message-ID: | 775F825B46B551499DC75DC4E92F80AB564D05@jupiter.ad.haydrian.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Parameterized.
IE (very simplified)
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION my_function(IN param1 BIGINT, IN param2
INTEGER)
RETURNS my_type
SECURITY DEFINER
AS
$$
/* my_type = (a,b,c) */
Select a,b,c
FROM my_table
WHERE indexed_column = $1
AND partition_constraint_column = $2;
$$
LANGUAGE SQL;
Matthew A. Peters
Sr. Software Engineer, Haydrian Corp.
matthew(at)haydrian(dot)com
(mobile) 425-941-6566
Haydrian Corp.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 9:15 AM
To: Matthew Peters
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Stored procedure slower than sql?
Importance: High
"Matthew Peters" <matthew(at)haydrian(dot)com> writes:
> How can a stored procedure containing a single query not implement the
> same execution plan (assumption based on the dramatic performance
> difference) that an identical ad-hoc query generates?
Parameterized vs non parameterized query?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard Troy | 2006-10-26 17:10:24 | Re: commit so slow program looks frozen |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-10-26 16:14:38 | Re: Stored procedure slower than sql? |