Re: pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive times for idle, interval,

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Rocco Altier" <RoccoA(at)Routescape(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pg-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive times for idle, interval,
Date: 2005-07-30 20:07:44
Message-ID: 7427.1122754064@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Actually, both the Single Unix Specification and the HPUX man pages are
pretty definite that the correct spelling of the parameter to getsockopt
is "IPPROTO_TCP"; which in fact is what we are using in existing calls.
This SOL_TCP thing is simply wrong.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-07-30 20:28:21 pgsql: Use the standard spelling of the protocol argument to
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-07-30 20:02:18 Re: pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive times for idle, interval,

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-07-30 21:44:29 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-07-30 20:02:18 Re: pgsql: Add GUC variables to control keep-alive times for idle, interval,