Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Shared memory

From: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
To: Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>,PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,PL/Java Development <Pljava-dev(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Shared memory
Date: 2006-03-28 19:38:27
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
The last time I talked to him Laszlo said he is working on it again.

On 28-Mar-06, at 2:21 PM, Thomas Hallgren wrote:

> Dave Cramer wrote:
>> What exactly is a FENCED solution ? If it is simply a remote  
>> connection to a single JVM then pl-j already does that.
> Last time I tried to use pl-j (in order to build a mutual test  
> platform), I didn't manage to make it compile due to missing  
> artifacts and it wasn't ported to Windows. Lazslo filed a JIRA bug  
> on that but since then (August last year) I've seen no activity in  
> the project. Is it still alive? Is anyone using it?
> Regards,
> Thomas Hallgren

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-03-28 19:44:21
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PANIC: heap_update_redo: no block
Previous:From: Thomas HallgrenDate: 2006-03-28 19:21:11
Subject: Re: Shared memory

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group