| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Åkerud <zilch(at)home(dot)se>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact |
| Date: | 2001-06-23 04:53:47 |
| Message-ID: | 7350.993272027@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my> writes:
> Why is SHMMAX so low on some O/Ses?
Historical artifact, I think: the SysV IPC code was developed on
machines that were tiny by current standards. Unfortunately, vendors
haven't stopped to review their kernel parameters and scale them up
appropriately.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Åkerud | 2001-06-23 12:29:22 | Re: TCP/IP Sockets, UNIX Sockets |
| Previous Message | Thomas T. Thai | 2001-06-23 04:12:31 | Re: Re: select to combine 2 tables |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Kreen | 2001-06-23 11:11:34 | Re: [PATCH] by request: base64 for bytea |
| Previous Message | Andy Samuel | 2001-06-23 03:24:02 | Red Hat DB = PostgreSQL confirmed ! |