Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Check constraints on partition parents only?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Check constraints on partition parents only?
Date: 2011-07-28 13:50:43
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> What we need is to persist information of a particular constraint to be as
> specified - ONLY for this table. We could do that by adding a new column in
> pg_constraint like 'connoinh' or something, but I guess we would prefer not
> to get into the initdb business.

Uh, why not?  I trust you're not imagining this would get back-patched.

> Alternatively we could bring about the same
> by using a combination of conislocal and coninhcnt.

Ugh.  New column, please.  If you're wondering why, see the flak Robert
has been taking lately for replacing pg_class.relistemp.  Random changes
in the semantics of existing columns are trouble.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-07-28 13:54:52
Subject: Re: Check constraints on partition parents only?
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2011-07-28 13:46:41
Subject: Re: error: could not find pg_class tuple for index 2662

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group