Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Transaction Snapshot Cloning
Date: 2008-01-12 16:57:25
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 19:23 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> [ blanches... ]  Can you say "security hole"?

> Static on the line, sorry. 
> I'm hearing "useful superuser-only capability". ;-)

It would be far *more* useful if it didn't have to be superuser-only.
And since the actual details of the snapshot content are really of
zero interest to the user, I think making it pass through his hands
is simply misdesign.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-01-12 17:02:41
Subject: Re: Some ideas about Vacuum
Previous:From: Mark MielkeDate: 2008-01-12 15:26:49
Subject: Re: Postgresql Materialized views

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group