Re: ARC patent

From: Jeff <threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)www(dot)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ARC patent
Date: 2005-01-17 20:21:59
Message-ID: 70894574-68C5-11D9-AC3A-000D9366F0C4@torgo.978.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Jan 17, 2005, at 2:57 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>
> We should be as proactive as possible with this and remove
> the code (or modify as required).
>

Perhaps a member of -CORE should contact IBM. The ball is out there
now due to the discussion on this list that we know we might have
infringing code. Might as well try to play "good citizen" and talk
with them, perhaps they'll give us some sort of indemnity for 8.0 so we
can get something perhaps better for 8.1.

--
Jeff Trout <jeff(at)jefftrout(dot)com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2005-01-17 20:22:30 Re: ARC patent
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-01-17 20:18:34 Re: [HACKERS] %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32