| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump --pretty-print-views |
| Date: | 2013-01-30 16:03:27 |
| Message-ID: | 7033.1359561807@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 01/30/2013 09:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to> writes:
>>> On 1/30/13 7:52 AM, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
>>>> However, I am not sure about putting "WRAP_COLUMN_DEFAULT" by default. In
>>>> my opinion we should put that by default but other people may object so I
>>>> will keep that in code committors plate.
>> FWIW, I'd vote for not enabling that by default --- it's basically an
>> unwarranted assumption about how wide people's terminal windows are.
> I'm not exactly sure what you're arguing for.
Maybe I'm confused - I thought the alternative Jeevan was talking about
was that we enable PRETTY_INDENT processing by default, but not
wrapColumn processing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zoltán Böszörményi | 2013-01-30 16:45:54 | Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request |
| Previous Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-01-30 15:58:07 | Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables |