Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 01/30/2013 09:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Marko Tiikkaja <pgmail(at)joh(dot)to> writes:
>>> On 1/30/13 7:52 AM, Jeevan Chalke wrote:
>>>> However, I am not sure about putting "WRAP_COLUMN_DEFAULT" by default. In
>>>> my opinion we should put that by default but other people may object so I
>>>> will keep that in code committors plate.
>> FWIW, I'd vote for not enabling that by default --- it's basically an
>> unwarranted assumption about how wide people's terminal windows are.
> I'm not exactly sure what you're arguing for.
Maybe I'm confused - I thought the alternative Jeevan was talking about
was that we enable PRETTY_INDENT processing by default, but not
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Zoltán Böszörményi||Date: 2013-01-30 16:45:54|
|Subject: Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request|
|Previous:||From: Jeff Janes||Date: 2013-01-30 15:58:07|
|Subject: Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables|